Over It (consulting) - Managing Consultant Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
15 Apr 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Some Individuals: Having worked for Capgemini over the last 5 years now, I am surprised at the calibre and values of some individuals, who are clever, hard working, ethical and driven. However, this is not across the board with a very mixed bag of talent. 2. Variety of Engagements: Consulting engagements are quite varied, which is great in terms of exposure to different challenges across a number of verticals - particularly for younger consultants, not so much for more senior consultants.

Cons

1. Leadership - It is non existent. In place of leaders, they have administrators that administer clients, people and results via spreadsheets. 2. Culture - It is schizophrenic . For a firm that asserts the "collaboration, freedom, trust and honesty..." are cornerstones of its organisational culture, it acts in direct contradiction to these values. Leaders and employees do not collaborate but continuously undermine each other to "own" relationships and outcomes for individual gain. Staff have no freedom to express their opinions because there is no 360 degree performance management, cliques exist from the top down and challenging decisions results in detrimental feedback. Interactions from the top down are characterised by an implicit distrust in individual agendas or ability to deliver. And the organisation as a whole is incapable of being honest with itself in terms of its capability, its competitive standing and what it brings to clients. The general culture is characterised by cynicism, apathy and game playing. 3. Priorities - Leadership are unable to articulate a vision or priorities in a way that connects with any human being. Priorities are expressed (almost exclusively) in financial terms, with no clear vision, plan for execution or understanding of tradeoffs. 4. KPIs - KPIs are cryptic, unrealistic and ineffective breeding institutional game playing, cultural fragmentation and devisive behaviours. 5. People Management - There is no clear career path for consultants beyond being placed on whatever opportunity is available at any given time, resulting in sub-standard outcomes for both clients, consultants and their careers. Drive and ambition is discouraged, while complacency and time in grade is rewarded. 6. Ethics - Senior management decisions around resourcing, customer engagement and performance management are often unethical. Too many examples to air... 7. Remuneration - Remuneration and reward systems are opaque, subjective and grossly uncompetitive. Most consultants are being offered significantly more from the clients they serve for less responsibility. The secretive pay scales have never been indexed (to my knowledge) nor have charge out rates. 8. Expertise - There is little to no investment in building or harvesting expertise. Any expertise that is hired is rapidly diluted by shoving 'square pegs in round holes'. Basis for competing is purely on price because of lack of expertise. 9. Sales Bloat - There are far too many sales people that have a complete lack of understanding of consulting, our client's needs and what it takes to deliver, resulting in either troubled projects or employee burnout.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
25 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
30 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All