Gogo Reviews

3.6

61% would recommend to a friend

(243 total reviews)
avatar

Steve Spengler

70% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Gogo has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 243 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Gogo employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Telecommunications industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

243 reviews
1.0
24 Oct 2017

Dysfunction like the world has never seen. Believe me.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Office building with friendly door staff Central location Annual free lunch to celebrate diversity Unlimited access to beer kegs The potential to work on new technology

Cons

Please don’t work here. It makes me sad to write this review, because I came into the company as a positive person wanting to make a difference. My experience here has left me a completely different person, and not for the better. I wish I’d done better research and took reviews more seriously before joining. I made a huge mistake. Sit in the building lobby (it’s open to the public) and observe the happy, energetic, smiling people coming in and out. Chances are, they don’t work at Gogo. There’s an incredible amount of spin about what it’s like to work here, so let this be an opportunity to clear the air. First warning sign? Fortune 50. Don’t be fooled by hype around Gogo being on a Fortune magazine list. It’s a pure marketing effort to shore up the company’s image, with Fortune & BCG generating rankings partially based on “machine learning to leverage unstructured data” - meaning computers read annual reports and spit out a score. Second warning sign? Gogo employees were coerced to write Glassdoor reviews. A few months ago, HR offered incentives for writing a review and sending in a screenshot. This ended after a few weeks, and luckily it looks like Glassdoor noticed and cleaned up some reviews as well. If those things didn’t raise a flag or two, we’d love to have you here because people keep leaving. But before you sign on the dotted line, here are 10 things you should keep in mind about Gogo: 1. Misplaced priorities and half hearted execution. Reception and prayer rooms are easy to find but hosting a networking event means pulling out an embarrassing easel with a [Restroom ->] sign. Gogo neglected signage, but had money for pretty airplane models in the lobby and on the wall. Basic things that someone forgot to think through? It’s the Gogo way. 2. No free snacks and drinks, but have a mouse. And we don’t trust you with our chips. Drinks and snacks will cost you real cash but you can pick up a free Apple wireless mouse, chargers, and phone cables from the IT vending machine. Free beer kegs are available 24/7 in our employee lounge. Security cameras are placed throughout the vending area “for your protection”. 3. To lead here, you don’t serve. You get served. Gogo has had its share of lawsuits from airlines and passengers over the years, just Google “Gogo lawsuit”. It’s baffling (but not surprising) that so many executives still hold their positions after multiple blunders. Management relentlessly pursues new business and try new ideas, but at what cost? Just read our 10-K. While it’s a competitive market, the failure to produce a profitable business model rests squarely with the management team. Rounds of funding have resulted in junk bonds and a shaky financial proposition. 4. Management mantra: There’s no me in we. And yes, we love narcissism. Executives continuously shield their own inadequacies and shortcomings with useless projects meant to wow each other. Videos, blog posts, LCD screens, and exec “war rooms” are the equivalent of 5th grade science fairs, trying to earn a passing grade. (Meanwhile, everyone else is down a meeting room since the room was annexed). You’ll work with VPs more concerned about building a personal brand and sharing content on LinkedIn, instead of communicating with their own teams. You’ll work with Directors utterly unqualified for their roles and incapable of leading a team; they’re there because of politics and personal relations with an executive. But don’t worry, they’ll all be the first to claim that things are getting better, and communication has never been better here. Sadly, not everyone is smarter than a 5th grader. 5. We care about our spending, with eyes wide shut. It gets better. An EVP will ask their team for budget cuts and cost savings, but will brag about their airline elite status to the entire team. Budget season? It’s a mad scramble to use up money we don’t have, so finance will give us the money we don’t have to spend next year. (Ordering extra equipment and supplies, IT vending machine) Executives need be held accountable for their individual spending, like everyone else. Stop flying up front and spending frivolously. Stop paying management consultants that are obviously ineffective. 6. The buck doesn’t stop here, because responsibility begins with someone else. Remember typing “self-starter” on your resume? Regret it. You’ll have a slim chance to shine before your manager takes credit. Be prepared to forge your own relationships, because we run around like headless chickens. Expect to be tasked with the work, but receive no credit for it. And take full responsibility when something does go wrong. You’ll meet some great, smart people, but they’ll be too busy doing everyone else’s work to help. Your answer may be on the 11th, 14th, 15th, 12th floor but no one truly knows. Chances are your question will go unanswered because of poor attitudes and work ethic, or because someone is working from home baking up a side business. The problem is widespread but starts from the top. 7. Let’s meet up, but make it quick. You’ll read about some HR efforts in other reviews, and responses from members of the executive team defending their investment in people. For a company of 1200 people, these investments are sorely lacking. Quarterly connections are supposed to be short quarterly reviews linked to OKR's or objectives and key results. These replaced traditional annual reviews. Someone in HR seemingly paid for this feature but skipped training on how to execute. Poor rollouts are par for the course at Gogo. Rather than learn from companies like Intel and actually understanding how they should be used, OKR's are treated as a joke across the executive team and an annoyance every 3 months. Need to understand team goals? They don’t exist, because the VP didn’t communicate any. Too busy with their LinkedIn content or flying somewhere for a conference. Unable to complete on time? Don’t worry, no one on the team actually did them. Your manager tells you they think they’re a joke and won’t have feedback for another 4 weeks anyway. Consequences? Don’t worry about it. We checked the quarterly review box. The laissez faire attitude and lack of accountability on a critical part of employee success is a reflection of the inability of the executive team to drive even themselves towards excellence. Reviews are merely a bullet point on a board presentation, not a bona fide effort in helping you be better at Gogo. 8. Want to move up? Good luck charting a path to your next position, because it doesn’t exist. There is no consistent method or consistency to how people are promoted or given titles. Requests for updated job descriptions to understand how you’re doing are met with hostility and being told that you should be adaptable to change in a fast-paced environment. Your actual work and achievement have little bearing on your career path at Gogo. You have a greater chance of getting promoted if you're willing lie, cheat, or have personal relations with an executive. (All has happened before). 9. Employee feedback means nothing here. Gogo contracts with an outside company to conduct an employee survey every autumn. You answer about 45 questions, and results are compiled into a report for management. The survey measures employee sentiment, and deficient areas of the company. It also provides insight into how the company compares to its peers. Very little is actually shared with employees, other than “we’re working the feedback into our planning”. What is shared is watered down and taken lightly by managers. The last report was shared with my team was over 2 years ago and not positive. Why not share the full report with employees? Why not have managers share their team’s results with them? Why not share what actions are being taken? Is there a reality that Gogo is unwilling to confront? 10. To-do: Build a culture around our technology and achievements and being good to each other. With the negativity at the company, it’s easy to lose sight of the great technology that we have the privilege to work on every day. It’s a beast and a reflection of the hard work of everyday people that do not get recognized on a regular basis. Our culture is a mix of blaming others, deferring work and blame, and struggling to keep up. It’s not a positive work environment that braces our achievements and encourages people to be civil to one another. Discretionary time off is a recruiting tool and management threat, not a real benefit. It is not unlimited and untracked. Every hour you take is entered and tracked, and comes up in quarterly connections with your manager. Why offer a benefit that causes stress and managers use AGAINST employees? It’s not enough to tell the everyone to “go further” or to “live our values”. Those are empty rallying cries that are worthless until executives lead by example.

avatar
Gogo Response
8y
We know the people we select and hire for our team, like yourself, have a significant and lasting impact on our organization and culture. There are several opportunities such as the employee opinion survey, focus groups and town hall meetings intended to promote transparency and open communication between all levels of the organization; where employees are encouraged to discuss issues and concerns with their managers and the executive team. We know and understand the input of our employees is extremely valuable and is central to the changes we make to improve employee experience. While I understand some of your points, others warrant additional conversation. I hope you’ll take me up on the opportunity to discuss your concerns and suggestions so we can work together to positively influence the change you wish to see. Michael has also expressed his desire to be a part of this discussion. Please reach out and we will make ourselves available. Karen Jackson, SVP, Human Resources
1.0
22 Oct 2018

Sinking Ship

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Central location near city and commuter train lines and nice physical office space Competitive salary and benefits Diverse workforce

Cons

Most people still working at Gogo don't want to be there anymore for many of the reasons outlined below (and more). Financial Instability: Over the past year, Gogo’s stock price has plummeted over 50%. The company is unprofitable and burning cash at an alarming rate. The CEO has publicly acknowledged that Gogo needs additional capital to survive. Either the interest payments and debt will bankrupt the company, or it will be sold to some poor sap who will decide what to do with the remaining employees. Top Heavy Management: Gogo has an overwhelming number of VPs and Directors, but it will take awhile to figure out what most of them actually do. Inflated titles leads these people to feel like they should weigh in on every decision. As a result, even seemingly simple decisions are routed to the Executives. Unclear ownership also leads VPs/Directors to constantly second guess each other because no one really knows what’s going on anyways. Directors spend the rest of their time randomly jumping into situations while adding no value in an attempt to make it look like they’re contributing. High Attrition: Turnover has been high for several years, but fresh bodies were consistently recruited to mask the problem. Overall employee count rose for a couple years until recently when all open requisitions were frozen and a layoff occurred. The layoff was not substantial enough to properly reorganize the company, nor will it be sufficient to alleviate the financial woes. Instead, it seems to have been a wakeup call to the company’s talented employees who have been fleeing in droves. The employees who remain are mostly checked out and looking for new jobs. Lack of Accountability: Excessive levels of management also serve to insulate the Executives and SVPs from learning the truth about mistakes, issues, and poor decisions (of which there are many). Each level is incentivized to cover up a problem so that by the time an Executive hears about it, the story has become so convoluted that no one can figure out the truth. There is no sense of scale or scope when it comes to what each level of management is accountable for at Gogo. Clueless Management: In additional to the disjointed structure, it is clear that many of the VP/Director ranks were successful following the mantra “fake it ‘til you make it”. Many of those who make up this crusty level of management are visibly in over their head. Many have been with the company since before its rapid growth and simply are not capable of effectively leading teams or projects at a quickly growing public company. It’s amateur hour. Uncollaborative silos: It’s hard to imagine a less collaborative environment especially considering the small size of the company with most of the employees based in the Chicago office. The left hand truly does not know what the right is doing. This issue is related to both the top heavy and clueless management in that people spend more time trying to hide mistakes than working together to find solutions. Lack of Process/Documentation: At first, the complete lack of any documentation on anything can be frustrating, but after awhile it becomes something of a joke for more tenured employees. Someone will ask in a meeting if a particular change to a process/design/order was documented and everyone will have a good laugh knowing that no such thing exists. If something happened 6 months ago, good luck finding any background on it.

1.0
15 Mar 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Location in the city is close to all transportation. Roof top of building. Free beer. Flexible hours, unlimited PTO. Some cool technology.

Cons

I would like to start with how my Gogo journey ended, my exit interview. It was scheduled for 30 minutes. I arrived at my HR business partner’s office. I waited, and waited, and then waited some more. My HRBP was over 10 minutes late to a 30 minute exit interview. Once we finally got started, HR asked me 2-3 brief questions and seemed completely disinterested in what I had to say. The entire exit interview lasted 15 minutes, including the first 10 minutes of me waiting. I figured this is what would happen, but still surprised. I would expect as a company, that exit interviews would be valuable information on why some employees are leaving. That way they could try to make the company either better, improve employee experience, or maybe fix an issue that exists. I have read other responses from Gogo HR about all these Gogo initiatives that are going in now or have been there to help improve. The problem is if you are not listening, nothing will change. You could have 300 processes and it won’t matter. Just like the employee survey, where nothing has ever changed. I had been with the company for a number of years and although these “initiatives” are in place it has only gotten worse. I left my exit interview feeling disregarded, this was a great reminder why I was leaving. I had a lot of doubt about leaving, but once this happened, I knew I was leaving for a good reason. Because if HR could not even show me common decency, like showing up to the meeting they scheduled. How could anyone else in the company. Management Gogo management 101: “If it’s worth doing, they must have at least three different teams doing it, all triplicating work and resources with zero communication.” The horrible toxic self loathing management. Where to begin. I think if you read through many reviews you will see complaints about management. There’s a reason. 1. Communication - between each layer of the company there are break downs in communication or simply no communication. 2. No vision or direction. No one has any idea what the true vision of the company is, nor their department, their group, and most times even what their job is. No one knows which department is doing what work since their boss has no idea, and their bosses boss either cannot be found or is confused as well. 3. Clear favoritism. This is between entire departments and individuals. We all know favoritism is going to happen sooner or later in any work environment. The problem at Gogo is they do not try and get rid of it, it is embraced and part of the Gogo culture. Some departments are allowed to spend almost endless capital. Other departments are allowed to hire at will, even during “so called” hiring freezes. Some managers are very blatant in their favoritism of employees, it is well known. I honestly don’t even care to get into it. Suffice to say some employees are untouchable. 4. Too much management, the org cart looks like a redwood. 5. Unqualified management. There are countless managers, director and VPs who have no business in their job. One particular management level job requirement was 10+ years in industry. The individual they hired had just over a year of experience, most of which was at Gogo. This was just the first requirement on the list by the way... The VPs I understand that VPs are part of management. But they are so special at Gogo they deserve their own category. For starters, Gogo has so many VPs, some with direct reports, which begs the question. Why are they a VP, and not just a manager? But why waste time contemplating that conundrum, there are VPs of no one... (sigh ...) Now past the VPs of no one. Most are looking to gain more office territory by trying to steal other VPs departments. Every 6 months there is either a small reorganization, or a major reorganization. Each time some VPs gain more office capital by getting more employees and departments. Even if they don’t know what they do, or have plans to continue the work they were doing. This is the constant state at Gogo. Everyone has to wait for the VPs to settle their disputes in order to get back to work. That’s if they even have a job, or all their work is now irrelevant and have to start over on something new...until the next reorganization. Working with VPs. When a new VP comes into a project or task, they state an idea that everyone has had for the past 10 years and claim it as their own “NEW” idea. Now since it is Gogo, it is now officially a new idea in Gogo-land terms. Until the next VP, usually 6 months to a year, is put on that project and come up with a “NEW” (same) idea. Now under the wonderfully “NEW” idea. These VPs will ask multiple departments usually around 30-50 people minimum to meetings to talk about their “NEW” idea and how they are going to fix it. Well this is good, let’s get communication between departments to fix the issue! Not exactly, this only means for the next 3-6 months everyone will waste their time in meetings, building reports for this VP. Only that VP will never make a decision on what to do next, besides stating their “NEW” idea. By the end of this cycle most people involved stopped going to the meetings—usually the VP first—and this whole initiative is dropped. Again, until the next VP has a “NEW” idea. Project + product management Little so say on product and project management side other than they have no idea how the products works, the technology involved, who the key players are in making it work, and simply don’t care to hear anyone else’s opinions that don’t support theirs. They are basically the masters of useless excel sheets. Quality. There is zero focus on quality in everything that Gogo does. This is why there is at almost all times a red alarm going off, because some new crisis just started and every single issue boils down to lack of quality. Example: The software is complete and utter garbage, good luck debugging an issue or even finding someone to help. There are things called best practices, I’m not sure Gogo has ever heard of them. Gogo culture. “Not my job, talk to so and so” Gogo culture is a very unique thing in all the wrong ways. Most of what encompasses Gogo culture is back stabbing, lying and trying to push others down, so they can move up. Gogo doesn’t reward those who work hard, work as a team or those who follow to the proper channels. Basically if you want to find the best example of what a work culture should not be. Look no further! Human Resources. HR is one of the biggest problems at Gogo. If you have an issue and feel the need to discuss with HR. First write down your issue on a piece of paper. Then take your piece of paper, and throw it in the trash. This will honestly help you out, and you will get a better result. If you do actually discuss your issues with HR, they will essentially do nothing and ignore it (just like every employee survey). I would say Gogo needs to clean house with some of their HR, but it won’t matter, since they will quit in 6 months to a year anyway and you are left with another HR person who doesn’t care

avatar
Gogo Response
8y
We understand the value of the insight that can be gained from employees throughout their employment at Gogo. Because of this, every employee is given multiple opportunities such as the employee opinion survey, focus groups, town hall meetings, exit surveys and 1:1 conversations to discuss issues. I’m sorry you did not feel heard or feel the impact of the changes we are making before you left the organization. As an example, our rollout of SAFe more broadly across our product and development teams should result in more cross functional collaboration across teams among other benefits. This increase in transparency will impact many of the concerns you expressed here. I do have additional questions about other points you wrote in your review. I hope you’ll take me up on the invitation to further discuss your concerns. Please reach out and I’ll make myself available.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 243 Reviews

Glassdoor has 276 Gogo reviews submitted anonymously by Gogo employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gogo is right for you.