Don’t work here - Project Manager General Motors (GM) Employee Review

1.0
19 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay in most roles is competitive If you like to work day and night and be at continuous risk of random lay off after record profits then this is your perfect fit! 😊

Cons

Toxic Senior Leadership - SLT Random Layoffs of 1,000 employees or month several times a year by email or text to, and I quote, to improve efficiency Forced rankings requires mgmt to rank 15% of employees as doesn’t meet ANNUALLY! We DO NOT have 15% bad employees. We don’t have enough staff after several years of layoffs. Expect to work literally day and night. We are global, you will be required to work all day and then call into international calls at night. Run, do not accept the offer unless you have absolutely no other choice. They DO NOT appreciate their employees

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
28 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

it is a good place

Cons

nothing much to say here

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All