Not sure if pay is worth the increased workload and tense workplace culture - Design Release Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

3.0
1 Oct 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Overall good benefits and salaries compared to suppliers and other automotive companies. 2) A majority of the employees are good, hardworking people that will collaborate with you and want you to succeed

Cons

1) The workplace culture has decreased dramatically over the past two years due to lack of transparency from SLT, multiple surprise layoffs, and overall distrust of GM leadership 2) Since the VSP’s in June 2023, there has been an increase in workload and decrease in support due to managers not having the ability to hire more team members 3) With some performance changes coming up, the culture is shifting from an automotive company to a tech or consulting company which is reducing the morale of current employees

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
14 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pays great in the state of michigan

Cons

Big company bureaucracy is annoying at times

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience with us. We would like to thank you for your contributions to GM and appreciate the feedback!
3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All